An answer to the nonjurors charge of schism upon the Church of England. Written by a Clergyman of the Church of England.

Similar Items

• Dr. Bennet's concessions to the non-jurors prov'd to be destructive of the cause, which he endeavours to defend; as they make the nonjurors to be the Catholicks, and his own communion to be schismatical. In a letter to a friend.
  by: Brett, Thomas, 1667-1744.
  Published: (1717)
• The layman's letter to the Bishop of Bangor or, an examination of His Lordship's preservative against the nonjurors ; Of the Vindication of the Realm and Church of England; Of the Nonjurors Seperation from Publick Assemblies, examin'd, by Dr. Bennet; and of all other late discourses, occasion'd by the Charge of Perjury, Rebellion and Schism, imputed to the Body of the People.
  by: Barrington, John Shute Barrington, Viscount, 1678-1734.
  Published: (1716)
• The difference between the nonjurors and the present publick assemblies, Not A Real, but Accidental Schism.
  by: Smith, Joseph, 1670-1756.
  Published: (1716)
• The layman's letter to the Bishop of Bangor or, an examination of His Lordship's Preservative against the nonjurors; ... and of all other late discourses, occasion'd by the charge of perjury, rebellion and schism, imputed to the body of the people.
  by: Barrington, John Shute Barrington, Viscount, 1678-1734.
  Published: (1716)
• A letter to Dr. Bennet, Occasion'd by his late treatise Concerning The non-jurors separation, &c. By James Peirce.
  by: Peirce, James, 1673-1726.
  Published: (1717)